Building Networks NZ

  • Home
  • Training
    • Online School
    • Customised Training
    • DIY Inhouse Trainers Packs
    • Topics
  • IQPs
    • IQP Training
  • Building Law
    • Article Library >
      • MORE Articles
  • Ongoing Training & Support
  • About Us
    • Contact
  • Store
    • Jobs-People in compliance >
      • Jobs
      • People looking for work
    • Download our FREE Guide
  • Bnet VIP
  • Home
  • Training
    • Online School
    • Customised Training
    • DIY Inhouse Trainers Packs
    • Topics
  • IQPs
    • IQP Training
  • Building Law
    • Article Library >
      • MORE Articles
  • Ongoing Training & Support
  • About Us
    • Contact
  • Store
    • Jobs-People in compliance >
      • Jobs
      • People looking for work
    • Download our FREE Guide
  • Bnet VIP

More Articles

From Building networks

Let's Talk About Pool Fencing, Feedback From The Frontline

30/1/2017

1 Comment

 
Picture
Belated Happy New Year folks, as most of you know the 1st of January was an unusual start to new Pool Fencing legislation but it is live and kicking now and I've been back in the thick of pool training in Wellington, Christchurch and Hastings. Some Councils have always had a proactive approach to pool audits, are on top of their database register, correspondence and approaches. Others are literally starting from scratch.

I have found there's a bit of misunderstanding out there so here's a few tips:

1. The Law has been passed. The correct reference is the Building Act 2004 NOT the Pools Amendment Act and NOT FOSPA. SO take a good look at your websites, checklists and reference materials to the public.

2. F9 NZ Building Code clause is now published and available HERE

3. The Acceptable Solutions AS1 and AS2 are not yet published. Indications from MBIE that they will be available late March. But as consents for pool barriers are coming across your desks now you have to assess against what the Code is and NOT wait for the acceptable solutions.

My advice go conservative and careful in approving anything less that what will comply with the old schedule 1 of FOSP 1-10 found HERE

4. Up to now lockable lidded spa pools never complied. Only pools that are 760mm in height and have a lockable lid with no more than 5m2 will be exempt from being inspected going forward. It will be the owners job to manage the risks.

5. The issue of Bi-fold doors as a means of compliance has not been fixed. They didn't comply with a top bolt and they don't now either

6. 3 yearly inspections time frame for inspections has already started 1/1/2017.

Want to know more?

links to MBIE website HERE

We have two-day courses for folk wanting to become private Pool Inspectors (IQPIs) which Council officers are welcome to attend too. We are also running some one day and half day customised in-house training for Council officers and customer service staff who are the front of asking questions on pools. If you would like a session brought to you just call our friendly team who can organise this for you.

Rosie
1 Comment

Cutting Corners Can Cost You Your Brand Reputation Not Just Money

25/1/2017

0 Comments

 
Picture












2 Key points to consider and 6 Questions to help assess the risk involved in big decisions

What has building law and compliance got to do with brand reputation? Perhaps everything.
After a recent case in the news and conversations with those who’s job it is to ensure these rules are kept I have identified 2 key ways that choosing to cut corners on a business renovation, new build or building Health and Safety compliance could impact a business, brand and reputation in the community and market.

1.Money
2.BRAND and reputation
One is sometimes recoverable the other not so straight forward.

My background is in marketing, business development and brand management, and lately I have been reminded how cutting corners even in the building industry can impact more than just your bank account, it can also impact your brand and reputation in the community and market place.
The irony about the #1 impact, Money, which is often first looked at, is that usually this is the primary reason for noncompliance in the first case, people wanting to SAVE money.

Lets look at brand and reputation, a much more ‘sticky’ spot for any business to find themselves, I have chosen to pick on a recent case that was publicised in the papers. This is a big topic and I realise that not every case has the same history, details or reasons but overall I believe my principals around brand and reputation apply in all cases.

Considering the recent successful prosecution of the blueberry and ice-cream brand OOB, one of the largest publicised fines handed down for building noncompliance in a while, I got to thinking about the brand impact of those early decisions made by the business owners.
Business is successful, it grows it needs more space. Or new business needs a building or more space in an existing one. Decisions are made! Sometimes advice is sought and in all fairness not given well or with the right intentions, in some cases advice may be ignored to save the immediate costs.

Either way that series of decisions, whatever the journey to make them, has cost this business a hefty $26k fine plus legal costs in money but maybe more importantly what has it cost them in reputation.

Some consumers may not realise or think deeply about what it can mean to not comply to the government standards for safe buildings and carry on eating the ice-cream without a care. I would say this is a minority though and I would like to think that most consumers in NZ expect the companies we claim ownership of in our clean, green and proud nation are providing not only a quality product but also a safe working environment for the staff and visitors.

I opened my freezer this morning to discover that the brand of blueberries I was about to enjoy for breakfast is in fact OOB! Immediately, I thought “oh those are the silly beggars who didn’t think they needed to comply to the building laws in NZ” I ate the blueberries, but I must say that I will think twice before purchasing their brand again.

They may have taken advice that set them up for a fall, but all business owners must realise the BUCK stops with them, and so does the reputation of the brand and company, who’s picture was in the paper with the big write up? The owners.

WHY such a harsh line? I hear you say…. Well what else, let’s not sit by and wait until another building collapses in a serious earthquake or fire killing or injuring people before we realise that the building laws are there to protect us all, and our families. Bottom line is that building laws save lives, and a company or organisation that constantly ignores the safety of the people they have in their buildings gives out a deeper message to the market and community they run in, they are more concerned about profit, expense cutting and time saving than people’s lives.

Strategically it is always good practice to think through decisions, if this is not someone’s skill set they should seek help from someone who has this ability, to think through future projections, risk factors and possible scenarios. Above all else, the person or people who the ‘buck stops with’ need to take full responsibility for understanding any laws that may apply and factor them in from the start.

6 questions a business/Organisation could go through when making expansion or moving decisions around buildings, office space, manufacturing spaces, retail spaces and more
 
1. Do you (or your contractors) know what you can do in your building without building consent?
2. With any consented work have you finished the projects with a CCC?
3. What is the Gap assessment between what our building has now and current Code?
4. If we have a BWOF in our building and are all our systems safely working?
5. Do the right people on our organisation know what risks exist in our building and what we are doing to manage them in plain English 
6. Could anyone get hurt, anytime in the future because of these decisions?
 
 
From a business strategy perspective, a good old fashioned cost analysis of any project should always include building compliance laws, cost of any upgrades and getting council consent.
If the project can’t fit into the budget it is not time to cut corners and potentially risk limbs and lives, it is time to look at alternative venues, buildings, or options.
 
Here is to a safer NZ
 
Jen Tyson
Business Development Manager 

0 Comments

    Archives

    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    August 2014
    July 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    November 2013
    March 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    February 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010

    Categories

    All
    Alternative Solutions
    AON
    Auckland Council
    Australia
    BRANZ
    Builders
    Building
    Building Act Changes
    Building Act NZ
    Building Code Training
    Building Compliance Documents
    Building Consents
    Building Control
    Building Industry
    Building Industry Compliance
    Building Inspection
    Building Law Change
    Building Law NZ
    Building Networks
    Building Owners
    Building Rules
    Building Training Solutions
    Buying And Selling Houses
    BWOF
    CCC
    Changes
    Christchurch Earthquakes
    Compliance
    Compliance Documents
    Compliance Schedules
    Conference
    Consistancy
    Councils
    Customer
    Department Of Building And Housing
    Disasters
    Due Diligence
    Earthquake Prone Buildings
    Events
    Exempt Work
    Facilities Manager
    Fencing Of Swimming Pools
    Fire Alarm
    Fire Safety
    Government
    Heritage
    Home Owners
    Hunn Report
    Informal Learning
    Investigation Skills
    IQPS
    Law Handbook
    Leaky Buildings
    Licensed Building Practitioner
    Passive Fire
    Property
    Property Investors
    Property Managers
    Protection From Fire
    Public Buildings
    Real Estate
    Rip-off
    Rosemary Killip
    Royal Commission
    Safety
    Schedule 1
    Seismic
    Simpson Grierson
    Skills Maintenance
    Spa Pools
    Tradesman
    Training
    Transferable Skills
    Trans-tasman
    Warrant
    Wellington City Council

    RSS Feed

    Join BuildNet
Picture

Contact Us

T: +64 4 472 1702
W: www.buildingnetworks.co.nz
E: office@buildingnetworks.co.nz

Quick Links

Home
About Us
Building Law
Online School
Training
IQPS
BuildNet
Store
Articles
Contact

Copyright © 2019 Building Networks Limited. All rights reserved