Building Networks NZ

  • Home
  • Training
    • Online School
    • Customised Training
    • DIY Inhouse Trainers Packs
    • Topics
  • IQPs
    • IQP Training
  • Building Law
    • Article Library >
      • MORE Articles
  • Ongoing Training & Support
  • About Us
    • Contact
  • Store
    • Jobs-People in compliance >
      • Jobs
      • People looking for work
    • Download our FREE Guide
  • Bnet VIP
  • Home
  • Training
    • Online School
    • Customised Training
    • DIY Inhouse Trainers Packs
    • Topics
  • IQPs
    • IQP Training
  • Building Law
    • Article Library >
      • MORE Articles
  • Ongoing Training & Support
  • About Us
    • Contact
  • Store
    • Jobs-People in compliance >
      • Jobs
      • People looking for work
    • Download our FREE Guide
  • Bnet VIP

More Articles

From Building networks

Safety in buildings… What a week it has been!

21/11/2016

9 Comments

 
Picture
  • A 7.8 earthquake and too many aftershocks to count
  • Floods in Wellington
  • Gale force winds
 
Is this Mother Nature’s way of pointing out how vulnerable we are?
 
Natural disasters have a way of reminding us how much we take for granted the services we rely on… Power, drinking water, waste water, rubbish collection, to name a few. When those basic services are taken away we adopt old school survival tactics; but being separated from love ones plus enduring dislocation and/or physical harm, ensure that basic fight or flight responses kick in, as fears both real and imagined come into play.  It can take some time to come down from that adrenalin high or to climb out of the cocoon we have built in the hope of protecting ourselves.
 
The three stages of survival following a natural disaster - (According to Rosie)
 
The following points are based purely on my own observations, they have no scientific measurement. Nevertheless, I wanted to share with you my reflections on the three stages of survival following a natural disaster.
 
Stage 1
 
In first response mode, we are just grateful for any figure of authority to inform us what is going on and provide instructions, provisions and sometimes comfort. At this time, we see another side of building inspectors than we would normally. In these circumstances, they are often welcome guests whereas in a normal situation they are too often vilified for just doing their job of compliance.
 
Stage 2
 
The general public are unhappy about displacement from their apartments, shops or offices. Understandably, we want to get back to normal as soon as possible; after all routine makes us feel safe.
 
Eventually things get back to a new normal and then our expectations start to rise again.
 
In some cases, the getting back to normality may be fairly fast and this can be psychologically beneficial as we adopt familiar routines and habits.
 
 
Stage 3
 
Over time, as routines return, we get complacent and take for granted the very things we valued so much just a few weeks before.
 
Our thinking minds kick back into gear.  And sometimes the fear turns into anger and frustration. We want somebody to blame, and we want some reassurance this won’t happen again. Sadly, this particular want can never be satisfied, by anyone!
 
The Aftermath
 
Despite safety being a basic bottom tier need on Maslow’s hierarchy of needs. Nobody, be that an engineer or a building inspector can absolutely and categorically guarantee any other person’s safety in a building.
 
The very next event could blow all the theories out of the water.
 
It’s easy to be critical of a building’s suitability after a disaster and expect its performance to exceed that of the era it was built in. But one must remember a building has to be under 33.3 per cent of current code to be deemed an earthquake prone building! That low threshold gives a lot of leeway and a lot of unknowns about the buildings at say 45 – 50 per cent.
 
Strangely, when it comes to buildings we don’t expect fire compliance or insulation to sit at 33.3 per cent of code, these must be 100 per cent. But structural changes to buildings are intrusive and expensive. It’s important to remember that in emergency or extraordinary circumstances New Zealand’s building code is designed ensure residents can evacuate a building safely, it is not designed to make the building 100 per cent usable the next day.
 
During recent events, most buildings have performed as expected. a smaller number have failed.
 
The reality is that we live in a country which is prone to earthquakes and the world as a whole is seeing weather extremes with huge environmental effects. Add to this mix, a huge stock of old buildings that were never built to modern building code anyway and we have a melting pot of instability. But remember that if the Government made a rule overnight that every building had to meet 100 per cent of the building code, the country would be bankrupt. Even then, there would be no guarantee that those buildings would be safe to occupy after 14000 aftershocks (the number experienced after Canterbury earthquakes of 2010-2012).
 
We are damned if we do upgrade, and damned if we don’t.
 
Let’s start the conversation from a basis of acknowledgement that nobody can take responsibility for our guaranteed safety in the face of natural disaster.


9 Comments
troy
27/11/2016 07:31:30 pm

My goodness. Man so clever, yet too busy to see how the animals do it, what nature has always showed, and man so clever, maybe even think it can outsmart our greatest teacher...

Reply
Bruce Falk
27/11/2016 07:38:15 pm

We can't beat nature.
To increase buildings to 34% is an attempt to get people safely out of the building. The buildiding may still be a demolition job.
Again it depends on direction of the thrust each building receives from which direction.
A building finished building yesterday may be badly damaged while the old building on a different orientation may be fine.
You can't beat nature

Reply
Bruce Falk
27/11/2016 07:38:36 pm

We can't beat nature.
To increase buildings to 34% is an attempt to get people safely out of the building. The buildiding may still be a demolition job.
Again it depends on direction of the thrust each building receives from which direction.
A building finished building yesterday may be badly damaged while the old building on a different orientation may be fine.
You can't beat nature

Reply
Bruce Falk
27/11/2016 07:39:07 pm

We can't beat nature.
To increase buildings to 34% is an attempt to get people safely out of the building. The buildiding may still be a demolition job.
Again it depends on direction of the thrust each building receives from which direction.
A building finished building yesterday may be badly damaged while the old building on a different orientation may be fine.
You can't beat nature

Reply
Wayne
28/11/2016 08:34:35 am

Governments are not to be trusted I feel to be responsible for keeping us all safe. Not so much for residential anyway. From the news I'm hearing it's the mordern buildings that are failing us. Same as the leaky home issue. All the modern up to building code homes, as required by 'law' have failed.. if a home owner goes to an architect and specifies they want a home built to withstand earthquakes great. But to ask government to create laws to tell everyone what to do..no thanks.. basic bracing elements yes. Which we already have. Over the top regulation that doesn't work such as this new health and safety crap that they have now shoved down our throats.. No!!
These larger buildings are not being designed properly. Architects and Enginners should be taking more responsibility

Reply
Troy link
28/11/2016 03:06:30 pm

You cant count on anyone but yourself when a disaster happens let alone the government. You just need to be prepared all the time.

Reply
Barbara McCrostie link
6/12/2016 02:57:56 pm

Yes it is a challenging time for all, thanks for a well written article which we will share with our merchants.

Reply
Adams Smith link
22/3/2017 01:12:18 pm

Yeah that's true ,We can't beat nature but at least need to take some precautionary measurement during constructions , such use quality material like frp, ideal mapping and etc.

Reply
ANITA YADAV link
8/7/2018 10:29:05 pm

What a great article!. I am bookmarking it to read it again. It seems like a very interesting topic to write about. Your posts is really helpful for me.Thanks for your wonderful post.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Archives

    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    August 2014
    July 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    November 2013
    March 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    February 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010

    Categories

    All
    Alternative Solutions
    AON
    Auckland Council
    Australia
    BRANZ
    Builders
    Building
    Building Act Changes
    Building Act NZ
    Building Code Training
    Building Compliance Documents
    Building Consents
    Building Control
    Building Industry
    Building Industry Compliance
    Building Inspection
    Building Law Change
    Building Law NZ
    Building Networks
    Building Owners
    Building Rules
    Building Training Solutions
    Buying And Selling Houses
    BWOF
    CCC
    Changes
    Christchurch Earthquakes
    Compliance
    Compliance Documents
    Compliance Schedules
    Conference
    Consistancy
    Councils
    Customer
    Department Of Building And Housing
    Disasters
    Due Diligence
    Earthquake Prone Buildings
    Events
    Exempt Work
    Facilities Manager
    Fencing Of Swimming Pools
    Fire Alarm
    Fire Safety
    Government
    Heritage
    Home Owners
    Hunn Report
    Informal Learning
    Investigation Skills
    IQPS
    Law Handbook
    Leaky Buildings
    Licensed Building Practitioner
    Passive Fire
    Property
    Property Investors
    Property Managers
    Protection From Fire
    Public Buildings
    Real Estate
    Rip-off
    Rosemary Killip
    Royal Commission
    Safety
    Schedule 1
    Seismic
    Simpson Grierson
    Skills Maintenance
    Spa Pools
    Tradesman
    Training
    Transferable Skills
    Trans-tasman
    Warrant
    Wellington City Council

    RSS Feed

    Join BuildNet
Picture

Contact Us

T: +64 4 472 1702
W: www.buildingnetworks.co.nz
E: office@buildingnetworks.co.nz

Quick Links

Home
About Us
Building Law
Online School
Training
IQPS
BuildNet
Store
Articles
Contact

Copyright © 2019 Building Networks Limited. All rights reserved